अद्वैत (advait) means; no two, only one.
It is a complete negation of difference, distinction or discrimination.
According to ancient Indian scriptures, there is only one, the infinite source
of all that exists, that is the God, the Supreme self. The Supreme self has
divided itself into infinitely many, which constitute the entire universe
having all that is living or not living. However, in this blog, I have no
intention to discuss about the universe and its origin. By chance I came across
two sentences written with an intention to discuss about two important
leadership skills. I quote them below.
The First: Perhaps the most
important skill a leader needs is to be able to think strategically.
The Second: Leadership is all
about having a vision of where you want to be and working to achieve that
vision.
I am
aware that the sentences quoted above have been used in reference to ‘business
leaders’ and not the ‘leaders of the people’; but I am not agreeable to
distinguish the two types of leaderships; because in both the cases the benefit
of the man must be kept above everything. If we distinguish the two for having
two different objectives, we would be submitting to duality and permitting the
conflicts appear between the two, between the interests of the people and that of the
business. To hide the conflict, we may have to resort to ‘strategic thinking’;
but, will it not be complicating the things for all concerned? The things that
do not hide or distort or convey multiple meaning are simple.
The
second sentence leaves much scope for ‘different’ interpretations. What meaning
we should attach to ‘having a vision where you want to be’? What is meant by
‘you’, one’s business? Does it include the owners, all the stakeholders, the
suppliers, the employees, the customers, the consumers and the public, in
general? And what do you mean by ‘want’? ‘Wants’ are invariably undefined and
without any kinds of limits. By accepting such a phrase we become totally
unrestrained and enter into an area where there is nothing but anarchy, anarchy
of thoughts and that of the conduct. Let
me attempt to write a different phrase.
In
place of the phrase referred in the preceding paragraph, if I say, ‘having a
vision where we (the man) should be’; then I, like all others, become a
participant in visualizing what is beneficial for us. When we share, we become
‘one’, not two; and things get simplified. This phrase suits both, the
‘business leader’ and ‘the leader of the people’.
I
find it difficult to accept the educative part of the two sentences under
reference.
Education
now, is no more a system of transferring the useful knowledge traditionally
earned by the human society through extensive and extended experiencing. It is
merely imparting skills to earn a livelihood in modern economic life. The
qualities that value and support welfare of the community are not even
discussed what to say about planting them in the character of the modern
generation. There is a great and urgent
need for making a way for quality of human life in the middle of restless
economic life focused singularly on inhomogeneous materialistic progress. This
need must be fulfilled by our education system. However, the modern education
system blocks the abilities of independent thinking in students by making the
education a highly uninteresting but thoroughly competitive drudgery.
It is
only the ability the think independently, without any bias and prejudice, which
can help us in simplifying things and getting rid of all dualities and
contradictions.
PROMOD
KUMAR SHARMA
[The
writer is the author of “In Search of Our Wonderful Words” and “Mahatma A
Scientist Intuitively
Obvious”.]
0 comments:
Post a Comment